Cholera, Global Health, Public health concern

Questioning Ban Ki Moon’s plan to address cholera in Haiti

Lately, a spotlight has been placed on the United Nations in Haiti. Outgoing Secretary-General, Ban Ki-Moon has delivered pivotal statements at the General Assembly and via the Miami Herald concerning the UN’s response to the cholera epidemic in Haiti. Right now is as good a time as any to remember the critical work that has already been done to eliminate the disease, long before Ban Ki-Moon’s big statement.  Right now is as good a time as any to remember the fact that Haiti’s future lies only in our own hands.

Before 2010, cholera, which mostly affected Asia and Europe centuries ago, did not exist in Haiti. It was imported from Nepal in October 2010 because of the continuous dumping of feces into a river by UN peacekeepers based in Meyes, near Mirebalais, in central Haiti. Weak hygiene and sanitation conditions since the beginning of the last decade, partly due to political instability, facilitated the rapid spread of the disease to the rest of the country. This shows the UN’s direct responsibility in the emergence of the disease in Haiti, a claim which epidemiologists have backed, and which the UN has fiercely denied and hidden over the last few years.

In 2016 the United Nations has suddenly changed their posture in regards to their role in the spread of cholera in Haiti and their response to the epidemic. The first hint at this change of heart came in a report by Philip Alston, a UN adviser criticizing the organization for its disastrous response. “The UN’s explicit and unqualified denial of anything other than a moral responsibility is a disgrace,” he stated. In early December this year, 6 years and thousands of deaths later, Ban Ki-Moon apologized to the Haitian people for the role his organization played in bringing cholera to Haiti.

In his Miami Herald Op-Ed, Ban Ki-Moon revealed the outline for what he called a “new approach to right a wrong” in Haiti. This approach revolves around intense response to outbreaks, reparations to the victims’ families, and long term development strategies to provide safe water to the population. As a physician familiar with the Haitian government’s already laid out plan to eliminate cholera by 2022 and the ongoing instrumental work of human rights advocates to hold the UN accountable, I struggled to find what was new about this proposal. Is the UN simply publicly parroting the existing national plan to eliminate cholera, or are they finally heeding the victims’ unceasing call for justice?

At the beginning of 2013, while the United Nations was still denying responsibility for the outbreak, the Haitian government with support from various international partners, initiated a 10-year cholera elimination plan, with a short-term component ending in 2016. At the time, many criticized this plan as being too broad. Among other things, it aimed to guarantee access to drinking water for 80% of the population. That was quite impossible in the planned timespan, given the lack of resources.

In fact, in 2014, Haiti came close to eliminating cholera. Were it not for repeated cases of vandalism on water systems in several regions among other factors, the strategies put in place would have been successful. The Ministry of Public Health and Population (MSPP) and the National Direction for Drinking Water and Sanitation (DINEPA) have learned from these experiences, and launched the mid-term part of the plan in August 2016 (before the UN’s change of stance ) with support from partners including UNICEF. This part focuses on axes similar to what Ban Ki-Moon introduced as the UN’s new approach: water and sanitation, healthcare services and management, epidemiological surveillance, health promotion, hygiene and nutrition.

While he did acknowledge the ongoing efforts against the cholera epidemic, the public health orientation Ban Ki-Moon outlined in his op-ed is not different from what has been laid as the basis for every actor in the national plan. His proposal uses the language and solutions proposed by advocates that the UN spent the last 6 years denying. Looking back, the path we have traveled in this fight is paved with lessons for Haiti as well as for the world. The General Assembly has agreed to support the new plan to eliminate cholera in Haiti, but I will not forget where the crucial work began and continues. As I continue my travels through various Haitian communities as a Haitian public health researcher or for personal activities, the notion that Haiti’s future lies only in our hands will remain a dear mantra.

Many thanks to Nathalie Cerin for the fantastic editing of this article.

Visit Woy Magazine

Standard
Contact, Public Health, Social Issue

Why Haitian Doctors Choose To Practice In Haiti

Three months ago, I was granted the opportunity to present the results of an epidemiologic research (scroll down to CO-057) I conducted at the latest conference of the French Society of Pharmacology and Therapeutics; a scientific institute aiming to advance research on drugs and their utilization. Being a local-trained and based doctor in Haiti, I was twice as happy realizing the many promises of medical research for the country. However at the same time, the back of my mind was still being gnawed by the many obstacles afflicting the Haitian health care system. For example, while the epidemiological threats are quickly diversifying, basic data collection and analysis are still lacking. And a flagrant misuse of local capacities is in many aspects a scourge. As the ongoing strike of residents exposes the system’s shortcomings, it is obvious that such structural inadequacies have long resulted in junior doctors’ exodus.

Read “Why young doctors leave Haiti”

But against these odds, many Haitian doctors choose to practice in Haiti, despite increasing promises of improved work environment and better opportunities for doctors in foreign countries. Even among the large community of Haitian doctors practicing abroad, the desire to come back to the motherland is often expressed.

There is no one reason for that desire to stay or come back to Haiti. A colleague told me that Haiti is the only place he feels he belongs and connected to. That regardless of the state of the healthcare sector, he is more likely to stay in Haiti, strong of his familiarization to the Haitian culture and way of life. Some doctors don’t have a choice at all, staying because of family situations such as marriage or a chronically sick child.

As a reason for their coming back to practice in Haiti, a few of my former professors evoked experiences of exclusion, discrimination and racism which have contributed to drive them back where they feel more appreciated and needed. One day, as I was in Brussels for a medical internship, as I handed my passport to an office staff member, I was startled as he shouted to me how chaotic of a country Haiti is. That experience helped me catch a glimpse of what many might be enduring abroad in regards to discrimination pertaining to their origin.

Deep inside, I know that personal reasons such as lifestyle, family situations or unfortunate experiences abroad are not sole factors to embrace Haitian medical practice. As a matter of fact, while most doctors who leave always give me clear reasons why they do, most doctors who stay never seem to be able to give me a concise reason why they do. What is for sure is that whatever the reasons given, they are almost always associated with a profound feeling of patriotism and a sense of duty when it comes to practicing medicine in Haiti.

In fact, as I described in many of my articles, factors such as a lack of capacity and initiative hold back the Haitian healthcare system. But regarding its current state, one of my mentors affirmed that Haitian doctors, as every citizen, need to redefine their relationship to Haiti instead of abandon it. According to him, overcoming our shortcomings in regards to health care is a patriotic duty. But how many doctors are there, visionary enough to make it their mission to stay or come back here and try to improve what can be? I am honored to know and work with many of them. As I was recently discussing with two senior doctors, they consented that leaving might earn them less stress but also less happiness. Their choice was motivated years ago, ever since their career started back in the 1980s, by the ambitious project to train generations of doctors in Haiti to solve Haiti’s health issues. Let me clarify that leading a health-related project in Haiti is barely an easy task. I know that because the organization I co-founded, integrAction, has long been trying to find a working strategy to accomplish its mission which is to improve health literacy in Haiti. But with the experience I gathered, I realized that an often silent sense of patriotism plays a key role in keeping people pursuing their project. For me, there is no doubt that this is the most important reason why doctors still choose to practice in Haiti over many other choices. It is a crucial driver and that’s good because the fact is that Haitian doctors are critically needed on their land.

Click to like integrAction’s Facebook page

This leads to another reason to practice in Haiti: the desire to cast a stone. Even though it’s a plausible argument for countless people, I’m not referring here to the year of service provided in exchange for the State’s investment in training doctors. In a broad sense, Haiti has nourished the personality and imagination of everyone who has spent time here. It has shaped who the people are- doctors included- through a complex net of trial and error, frustration and victories. And as the saying goes, much is often required from whom much is given. For a lot of Haitian doctors, staying in Haiti helps them to be useful and contribute where they are needed. And they all agree that politicians and those in charge of the health sector have the obligation to foster an adequate and coordinated work environment for more and better impact.

In the midst of a health system in crisis with no apparent short term resolve, my questioning the motives behind Haitian doctors’ choice to keep a practice in Haiti was both justified and eye-opening. It helped me determine where to look at in order to inspire the future doctors of this country. A mixture of personal preferences seem to be an important factor but patriotism and the aspiration to contribute to the community are also deeply ingrained. As Haitian doctors continue to build and struggle against all odds, the need for advocacy for an improved work environment and opportunities to live a fulfilling life in Haiti is mandatory. Human resources are the most important asset of any system and to achieve ambitious health goals, we need to maintain our precious medical work force.

SFPT2016

Presenting my research entitled “Evaluation of antibiotics self-medication among outpatients of the State University Hospital of Port-au-Prince, Haiti” on April 2016.

 

Standard
Global Health, Public health concern, Social Issue

On the shades of violence in Haiti

When we first moved to our current neighbourhood ten years ago, the sides of our impasse was occupied by poorly maintained shrubs and houses isolated from each other. Only one car could manage to go through a narrow path left between the trees. Acquaintances often quipped about us living in such a remote place, hardly accessible and sometimes dangerous, given the numerous cases of kidnapping that had occurred there in the past. Indeed, the main avenue was not even fully concreted and huge potholes spread along the road. But ever since the earthquake hit, people from diverse and unknown backgrounds have settled on unfenced lands nearby, slowly changing the settings. Retail sale of clairin, a popular alcoholic cocktail, has flourished since then and round the clock gambling also attracts many young unemployed. Gun related and gender specific violence were quickly added to the picture, outlined by injuries, addiction and mental health issues.

Over time, we got used to the times when drunken men cause inconvenience and to the days when quarrels over money or marriage issues block access to our home. But as an extreme example of how unchecked violence has spread, three young men were recently found dead on the streets, killed by heavy gunfire heard during the night. Surprisingly when it comes to violence, young people seem to be the most vulnerable. Violence claims the lives of 200,000 young people per year worldwide and represents the 7th cause of death in Haiti.

The disastrous political context of the country during the last decades has shaped the minds towards believing that violence is inevitable. Not only have people engaged in violent acts for the smallest rewards, but many accustomed to political turmoil think of violence as a substantial part of their daily life. The general public and the policy makers consider violence more as a banal indicator or trend, going up and down but never as an issue plaguing their own personal and community health. In our communities, the trivialization of violence is in fact, the result of inaction which results in more violence, repeating a vicious cycle and accumulating into increased cases of serious injury, chronic diseases and perhaps lowered life expectancy.

The popular culture has long encouraged violence against women through apologies of machismo and the objectification of women. It goes without saying that despite women’s rights activists’ campaigns, they remain the largest target of verbal and physical violence. Misogynistic words being too often valued and praised, they somehow abound in the media, accompanied by degrading images of women and hateful mocks. Even in my youngest years growing in Cap Haitian, the tendency to disregard women and LGBT communities’ values had already been deeply rooted in most boys my age. So it was not surprising that, as a medical intern in Cap-Haitian decades later, I couldn’t keep count of the cases of gender-related violence registered in the emergency service. There were even cases where serious burns were the consequence of such domestic violence.

Besides the factors mentioned above, structural violence seems an even more important cause of physical violence. The lack of education, unemployment, social and economic inequalities, exclusion, gender-based, racial or religious discrimination and poverty among other factors stand as complex mechanisms preventing many people from defining and fully realizing themselves. In the countryside, the absence of an efficient mean to uphold justice leaves enough space for violent conflicts over land tenure, often leading to deaths. Although there are no excuses to violence, it is rooted in a highly unequal society, which leaves very little opportunities through decent jobs and an environment to realize one’s potentials. As a matter of fact, the World Health Organization referred to concentrated poverty, easy access to alcohol, drugs and guns and weak governance as main risk factors for youth violence. And as far as we know, the daily lives of most occupants of cluttered neighborhoods in Haiti consist of much of these factors.

Although the population may rejoice in the brutal murder of robbers, these acts may not be more than a Band-Aid on a deep wound, if the core problems remain unaddressed. Perhaps it would be useful to keep engaging all communities proactively in order to expel the idea that violence is normal and inevitable in Haiti. Communication should counter the idea that the situation is acceptable today simply because it was worse 12 years ago, because no level of violence is suitable. It will be mandatory, to teach or keep reminding our communities the fact that women are equal to men both in their body and their mind. School children should be taught that violence makes orphans and leads to many health consequences. If young people are offered the opportunity to play a role in their country’s path to development, if they are able to support their families with dignity and respect for others’ property, it will certainly make a difference and that is definitely a worthy investment for the future.

Cluttered neighborhood

Standard
Public health concern, Social Issue

The weight of social approval

During a short break from seeing patients, I was sitting behind the desk, enjoying an appealing novel. In the heart of the neighborhood of Jalouzi, in Petion-ville, the atmosphere was rather comforting, punctuated with laughter of children and chants of street vendors wandering outside. Betty, the nurse in charge of patients’ vital signs laid on the wooden bench in the waiting room looking preoccupied. At some point, she got closer to me and shared her concern: Ever since she started working at the center, she had gained several pounds and feared to have crossed the line of obesity, making her susceptible to the health threats associated with it (mostly cardiovascular diseases).

Betty is a short and curvy, 24 years old woman. She confessed to never doing exercise. Even back when she was at school, the court was too small and physical education wasn’t part of the curriculum. She also grew up in a family where women proud themselves on their thickness. According to her family and peers, it is a mandatory asset to attract a mate.

Generally, clinicians use the Body Mass Index (BMI) to assess the adequacy of weight in patients. This index, designated as indicator of fatness, is a ratio of the weight (kilogram) in relation to the square of the height (meter) of the person. A BMI score equal or greater than 30 is required to classify a person as obese while between 25 and 29.9, he/she is said to be overweight. In 2008, the World Health Organization reported an increase in the number of overweight and obese people, especially in developing countries where 115 million people bear the burden of disease due to obesity. It is important to note because in developing countries, including Haiti, the many health problems co-exist with poverty and a blatant lack of basic education, strengthening the vicious circle. As a consequence, the impact of obesity goes beyond the individual and also affects the State in terms of cost of related diseases.

01

Betty had a BMI at 34; far along in the side of obesity. When I asked about her diet, she told me that she often consumes fried and greasy meals many times a day. Her sedentary lifestyle along with the popular culture that particularly promotes female thickness is also a factor. Other obese patients have even confessed to having resorted to self-medication and other practices to gain weight and develop a body shape, given the social standards, that is valued by most people. Bearing in mind the concept of health as defined by the World Health Organization, self-acceptance undoubtedly has an important role to play in the overall well-being of a person. But self-acceptance is sometimes too tightly dependent on social norms. Therefore isn’t it important in specific cases to question these norms and ideas of beauty that lead to self-flagellation and degradation of the body in the long term?

For instance, let’s go back to the origins of the Body Mass Index used to determine obesity. It was first described in 1832 by a Belgian mathematician and statistician called Adolf Quetelet. After the Second World War, it became crucial to develop a reliable index of normal body weight as the relation between weight and illness and death represented such a shattering concern in the medical world. But the researchers only referred to Anglo-Saxon populations to gather the data. Hence, the ideal Body Mass Index is not quite representative of the every person since African populations among other ethnics had been ignored in the studies. Another bias is that fat is not the only component of body mass. Muscle mass makes it even harder to generalize the obesity measurement standard. As a matter of fact, studies have shown that blacks have lower body fat and higher lean muscle mass than whites, so the same BMI score may lead to less obesity-related diseases. It doesn’t mean that the index per se is useless in African populations but the situation opens doors to further research which may lead to ethnic adjustments. In that vein certain groups have begun to lower cut-off points for the BMI of Asians.

After our exchange, Betty promptly acknowledged the challenge to merge her idea of beauty with her desired state of health. While the prospect of developing a perfectly objective standard for determining obesity and its health risks is still blurry, we need to keep in mind that the perception of beauty itself remains subjective. The balance between what is culturally preferred and what is healthy is also delicate and difficult to reach. Undoubtedly there seems to be a shift of consciousness among young women in Haiti. Hopefully properly designed and culturally tailored health communication campaigns are going to meet them halfway.

Standard
Global Health, Public Health, Public health concern

Health communication in the time of Zika in Haiti

The day was coming to its end as I was dealing with annoying paperwork at an outpatient clinic in the area of Delmas, in Port-au-Prince. The attending nurse sharply knocked at the door and introduced me to Zoune, a woman in her mid-forties. Calmed by the fan in motion, the ambient heat hardly bothered on this particular afternoon. Even though January hasn’t seen any rain yet, puddles and piles of rubbish in the streets form a sure cottage for mosquitoes. The tropical temperature also stimulates their reproduction. Zoune presented clinical features of the Zika disease, urging me to initiate a symptomatic treatment based on my judgment and order a few screening tests. Ever since the confirmation of Zika cases in Haiti by the Health Department (and even before) the public carefully monitor themselves for signs of the disease and inquire with their doctor. Of course some prefer to get themselves treated with simple non-pharmaceutical interventions.

The Zika virus disease is transmitted by the bite of Aedes mosquitoes, infected by the virus. Identified in humans for the first time in 1952 in Uganda and Tanzania (Emerging point of Chikungunya virus which caused an outbreak in Haiti in 2014), it spreads especially in Africa and tropical countries. This non-fatal disease involves a febrile syndrome associated with lumbago (pain in the lower back), simulating Chikungunya or malaria which is endemic in Haiti. The emergence of Zika virus disease was foretold long before its introduction in Haiti. Climatic conditions punctuated by global warming as well as migration have positively contributed to its emergence.

Currently, one can refer to an epidemic in Haiti since Zika was simply non-existent across the territory. Even though it’s relatively simple to limit its spread- provided that hygiene and sanitation measures are met- difficulties particularly arise on this level. How to involve most of the people in this dynamic? Proactive communication is the first step in management of an epidemic. But between the limited resources and the outright flaws in the Haitian healthcare system, the public is far from being reassured. Communication weaknesses have already started to plague the good management of this outbreak, hence affecting trust even more. As a matter of fact, the confirmation notice of the presence of the disease in Haiti came late compared to expectations of the people who observed that it was rapidly gaining ground and awaited a word from the Ministry of Health.

According to my observations, the greatest fear of the public lies in the eventual complications of the Zika virus disease; mainly brain malformation in newborns and Guillain Barre Syndrome which causes paralysis of the body. Although scientific literature hasn’t confirmed any link between these complications and Zika yet, in some countries where Zika spreads, women are warned to delay pregnancy or to avoid areas affected by outbreaks. In the United States, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have elaborated guidelines for the screening of pregnant women by gynecologists. Some see this as a unique opportunity to revive the debate on abortion in countries where a modern law is lacking. But at the time of writing, no campaign whatsoever is officially launched in Haiti thus, no warning regarding pregnancy or increased promotion of contraception services has been issued by the Health Department. The public is therefore facing the fear of this epidemic with the feeling of being on their own.

In order to foster behavioral changes necessary to protect lives, it’s important to know the perceptions and existing practices of the population. A never-ending conversation with the public allows effective management and is worth more than sparse and scant monologues in times of panic. During the Chikungunya outbreak in 2014, the organization I co-founded integrAction was delighted to share ideas and experiences with the socio-medical staff of the Haitian Red-Cross (many of whom were infected) in Cap-Haitian during a conference. This initiative helped the organization conceive groundbreaking campaign with appropriate health communication to raise awareness via social media on the disease and the means to cope with it.

On a broader scale, the current turn of public health history is an opportunity to consider reinforcing leadership capacities from the bottom to the top, while investing in research and improving the public’s health literacy. For most of the population, there’s more fear than harm as in the case of Zoune. So engaging the people through proactive communication followed by prompt action is one of the best ways to halt the spread of Zika and its potential consequences. As they express much disappointment, the Haitian people can only hope for less vulnerability. But if today’s duties are unceasingly postponed, the future, undoubtedly, can only be more grim.

A health worker fumigates the Altos del Cerro neighbourhood as part of preventive measures against the Zika virus and other mosquito-borne diseases in Soyapango, El Salvador

A health worker fumigates the Altos del Cerro neighbourhood as part of preventive measures against the Zika virus and other mosquito-borne diseases in Soyapango, El Salvador January 21, 2016. REUTERS/Jose Cabezas

Standard
Public Health, Public health concern, Social Issue

Let’s change the rules to save women’s lives in Haiti

Fairly called Poto Mitan in Haitian Creole, women account for 50.49% of the Haitian population and represent the center pillar of most households. From commerce to education, their contributions to the society are undeniable. As the prosperity of the nation relies on its citizen’s well-being, it is no surprise that women’s health is a public health priority when it comes to the national health policies. But despite the efforts, unsafe abortion remains unfortunately a scourge as prevalent as poorly addressed.

I recall my last shift at Chancerelles’ maternity ward where a 16 year-old pregnant girl presented with intense abdominal pain and massive vaginal bleeding. At first, she did not admit any medication ingestion prior to the onset of her symptoms. But as we pursue the medical investigations, her 30-year-old boyfriend confessed that he had provided her with 4 pills of an over-the-counter drug known to provoke abortion in pregnant women. For the gynecology residents, it was a routine and classic case. Yet openly discussing unsafe arrest of pregnancy in Haiti is controversial since it’s so much of a taboo.

The World Health Organization (WHO) defines unsafe abortion as a procedure for terminating a pregnancy performed by persons lacking the necessary skills or in an environment not in conformity with minimal medical standards, or both. Every year, 50.000 women, mostly from Latin America and Caribbean countries, die from consequences of unsafe abortion. According to the article 262 of the Haitian penal code, induced abortion no matter where or who performs it, is a criminal act and legally punished nationwide. But regardless of the law (or maybe because of it), complications of clandestine abortions are common motives of visit in general and obstetrical care facilities.

SDG3

Target: By 2030, ensure universal access to sexual and reproductive health-care services.

Carole, the latest patient I examined, was going through her second abortion experience and presented with severe anemia after 15 days of bleeding. When she got pregnant, economic difficulties arose, urging her to take the decision with her husband’s consent. But the specialized hospital she visited wouldn’t provide the desired services as forbidden by the law. So she turned to a clandestine clinic, even when the fees were high. As we shared our opinions, she said that it would be beneficial for women to abort safely with optimal medical assistance because the absence of a legal framework for safe abortion and technical capacities almost took her life away.

A few days later an obstetrician and HIV care specialist told me that to alter the perilous consequences of unsafe abortion in Haiti, it would be best to decriminalize it. Among the 530 women deaths per 100.000 inhabitants per year in Haiti, 120 are attributed to unsafe abortion. Fortunately, in the last quinquennium, the Ministry of Health has debated the subject and elaborated a new bill with several social groups to allow abortion for medical purpose and in rape cases. This is one step forward in the modernization of women’s health in Haiti even when it hasn’t reach the parliament yet.

But the main causes of induced abortion being socio-economic status, maybe the bill should also include women who desire to arrest their pregnancy for any reason other than congenital malformations or rape. It would be better if every woman could openly  discuss it with their doctors.

Because it is the State’s duty to guarantee optimal health care to the population, and health is not restricted to the body. It includes mental and social well being.

It would be valuable to couple activism with effective health communication. Because often, the barriers to improving women’s health in Haiti are some erroneous traditional beliefs. My intention here is not to downplay any religious or cultural values, as some have actually improved women’s health. My advocacy is to conduct proper scientific studies on this public health issue and clearly communicate the best ways to prevent the consequences. After all, prevention costs exponentially less than complication management and as the recently published statistics show, the State’s funds have long been depleted.

Standard
HIV/AIDS, Public Health

A New Approach is Needed for HIV/AIDS Treatment in Haiti

Published in Woy magazine 

At 28 years old, Mariette is a young energetic woman caressing hopeful dreams for her child. She mourns the death of her husband, who recently passed away from AIDS (Acquired Immuno Deficiency Syndrome). Also infected by the HIV virus, she regularly receives a triple-drug therapy at the Justinien Hospital at Cap-Haitian. Regularly, Mariette and her daughter make the 45 minute trip from her hometown Limbé to Cap-Haitian to receive treatment. Like Mariette, many HIV-infected patients living in areas around Cap-Haitian travel to reach the Justinien Hospital for regular biological and clinical follow-ups.

Mariette is one of the lucky few able to benefit from antiretroviral treatments. While antiretroviral drugs have been available in industrialized countries since 1996, it was not until 2002 that Haiti received a substantial donation from the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria which led to the first treatment programs by two organizations fighting the disease on the field since its early days. In that same year, the World Health Organization released guidelines for the treatment of HIV/AIDS for the first time in history.

Despite such tremendous progress, not every infected patient could benefit from therapy immediately after diagnosis, mostly because of the high cost of treatment and the lack of health insurance. As noted by United Nations Program on HIV/AIDS, “by 1998, while 95 percent of people with HIV were living in poor countries, almost none had access to antiretroviral therapy, which then cost $12,000 to $16,000 a year per patient.” Among other reasons, it seems that this is how the World Health Organization determined patients’ treatment eligibility because it was simply too expensive to provide medication to everybody; so they prioritized the patients who were in more advanced stages of the disease, those who were much sicker. Therefore, it was not until Mariette became very sick that she was finally admitted to the hospital and was declared eligible for drug therapy in accordance to the 2010 guidelines, which are currently used in Haiti. This delay, from the diagnosis time to the start of her treatment, increased the risk of transmission in addition to other health consequences. Unfortunately, this is currently the story of millions of other HIV-infected people.

However, to decrease the spread of HIV/AIDS and ultimately eliminate it by 2020, scientists are planning a bolder strategy, named “test-and-treat”. The suggested strategy entails the initiation of therapy immediately after a positive HIV test, regardless of the biological and clinical parameters, as it used to be. Regarding this new approach, a recent publication on the medical journal The Lancet stated that: “Instead of dealing with the constant pressure of newly infected people, mortality could decrease… Transmission could be reduced to low levels and the epidemic could go into a steady decrease towards elimination.” As of this writing, test-and-treat represents the core strategy in WHO guidelines for HIV treatment, published in September 2015, 13 years after the original publication. If the Haitian government works to apply this as part of the national plan to eliminate HIV/AIDS in Haiti, more people like Mariette can start therapy sooner than she did and will have a higher chance of survival, without passing the virus to another generation.

AqFU42gg946pyr3PMMgnEWsmK929nQfGFdmGeYmZvwM9

Today, Haiti is at a crucial point in the history of the 30 year-old pandemic, but faces many challenges to achieve the desired goal. In order to meet the gigantic promises of test-and-treat, the Haitian government must work towards a sound reinforcement of the healthcare system with a focus on the people by preventing the massive exodus of qualified health professionals. The fight against discrimination and stigma must become a priority, because every man’s life is valuable no matter his status in society. The number of testing centers in Haiti must increase for early detection.  The government needs to establish adequate cooperation with international partners in order to have available drugs for every infected patient. And most of all, we must continue to educate the youth about this virus. Marie-Ange, Mariette’s daughter is only twelve years old. However, Mariette ensures that she transmits her knowledge and experience fighting HIV to her young daughter. At the end of the day, as the sun began to retreat, Mariette boarded another tap-tap with her daughter to rejoin their community in Limbé. Because of the antiretroviral treatment, Mariette continues to hope.

 

Standard